Skip to main content

Design partners

Use it on a decision you were going to make anyway.

Clyreon is built and running, and not generally available yet. A small number of teams are using it now, on real decisions, and shaping what gets built next.

Who this is for

Three things make a team a good fit. None of them is company size.

Consequential

Your team makes decisions where being wrong costs something real (a renewal, a hire, a supplier, a legal exposure, a budget) rather than decisions that are reversible next sprint.

Slow to resolve

The gap between committing and finding out is measured in quarters or years. If you know within a week whether you were right, your organisation probably still remembers why it decided.

Already feeling it

You can point to a specific decision your team made where nobody can now explain why. That recognition is what makes a partnership productive; without it, this is an interesting idea rather than a problem.

Customer Success and Account Management are the clearest first case. The teams that ship today also cover sales pursuits, product decisions, hiring, procurement, vendor risk, legal review, budget approval and customer escalation.

What participation actually involves

Real usage on real decisions. Not a pilot that runs in a sandbox.

First conversation

Thirty minutes, no slides. A conversation about what you are deciding and whether Clyreon is the right fit. If it is not, finding that out now is the useful outcome.

Getting started

You sign up and get a brand-new organisation with you as its first owner. No credential handoff, no manual step on our side. You invite the actual people who will open and judge decisions, each with exactly the capabilities they need.

The first record

Opened together on a kickoff call, in the first week, on a decision your team is genuinely facing, not a demo record.

Cadence

A recurring review of what is working, what is confusing and what is missing, plus a way to report a problem as you hit it rather than waiting for the next scheduled call.

Two checkpoints

Success criteria are agreed and written down before the partnership starts, then reviewed together at its midpoint and its end, rather than tracked quietly and revealed at the end.

What we are trying to learn

You should know what you are being asked to help establish.

Whether it changes the decision

Whether writing down your position, your reasoning, how sure you are and what would prove you wrong actually changes how carefully a decision gets made. “It did not” is a real and useful answer. That is a finding too.

Where it is wrong

At least three product defects or gaps found through real use that internal testing would never have surfaced. That is a success criterion on our side, not a risk we are hoping to avoid.

What it is worth

An honest answer to whether you would pay for Clyreon at a real price. Not would recommend. Would pay. This is also why there is no published price list yet.

What is deliberately not measured: login frequency, time in app, or any engagement metric that could be maximised without decisions actually being better recorded. A team that opens Clyreon once a week to record one important decision carefully is a bigger success than one that opens it daily with nothing load-bearing happening inside it.

What you get

And what you keep, whatever happens afterwards.

The whole product

Everything as it exists today, not a limited trial or a feature-gated tier, including what is deliberately not built yet, stated plainly rather than discovered.

Direct access

To the person building it, not a support queue, and real influence over what gets built next.

Your data

Exportable at any time in a signed, integrity-verifiable bundle, regardless of how the partnership ends.

An accounting

Whether it converts, extends or ends, you get a real written record of what was found and decided.

Third-party penetration testing and a completed SOC 2 report are scheduled ahead of general availability and are not complete today , stated here the same way it is stated to a security reviewer.

Starting the conversation

One address. Tell us what you are deciding.

Email sushantdangwal@gmail.com. The most useful thing you can put in it is one real decision your team is facing right now, and roughly how long it will take to find out whether you were right.

No limited-time offer and no limited number of places. If Clyreon is not right for what you are deciding, a thirty-minute conversation is the cheapest way for both of us to find that out.